Martha Stewart: Not Such a Good Thing Essay

1. What issues did Martha Stewart, Bacanovic, and Faneuil miss in settling on their choices about selling the ImClone stock in their lead following the deals? Apply the models and make a rundown of recommended addresses they could have asked that may have influenced their choices. I don't feel any of them were pondering any outcomes! For what reason was this modest quantity of cash so essential to them, particularly Ms. Stewart, who was a multi-very rich person at that point? Unmistakably they weren’t worried at all about result and just proceeded with their plan that they really figured they could pull off without getting captured. 2. Was selling the offers unlawful? In the event that selling the offers was not illicit, was it exploitative? Selling shares are not unlawful; it’s all piece of the financial exchange. In any case, when you have propelled information like this case, it is fringe and incredibly unscrupulous. She was considering just herself and the benefits she’d make, and not thinking about the organization and different investors by any stretch of the imagination. I would go similar to calling it wanton and ravenous! 3. What do we find out about long haul results from Ms. Stewart’s lead and case? Having a lot of cash can turn an individual fiendishness. Martha was a multi-very rich person, and why she thought about two or three hundred thousand is insane. In addition to the fact that she served prison time, lose regard and cash, her stock has diminished The open presently observes that she isn't reliable, on the grounds that she admitted to hindrance of equity and offering bogus expressions to government examiners.